Philosophy
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Philosophy by Title
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item A New Argument for Ethical Evidentialism(Springer, 2024-08-09) Zamulinski, BrianThis paper contains a new argument for evidentialism as an ethical rather than an epistemic doctrine. The argument relies on new developments in consequentialist thinking. The insights of the proponents of the moral encroachment thesis are used to show that we need higher standards of evidence, and to develop the concept of ethically sufficient evidence. It is demonstrated that prospectivism (subjective consequentialism) supports the contentions that we should not believe without ethically sufficient evidence, that we are permitted to believe when we have it, and that we are obligated to investigate to acquire it. It is argued that we do not have any obligations to believe. The ethical evidentialism argued for here is distinguishable from Clifford’s ethics of belief. Developing the doctrine clarifies some of our moral obligations, makes a positive contribution to prospectivism, and shows that evidentialism is better construed as an ethical doctrine.Item Orgasm and art(Jozac Publishers, 2021-01-01) Pfeifer, KarlKarl Pfeifer argues against the view that an aesthetic experience must be a uniquely special kind of experience by means of an analogy with sexual experiences. Nonetheless, he leaves open the possibility that some aesthetic experiences might still be of a special kind.Item The Normative Significance of Flatulence: Aesthetics, Etiquette, and Ethics(IAFOR (International Academic Forum), 2020-01-01) Pfeifer, KarlProceeding on the basis of reports of a proposal in 2011 to criminalize public flatulence in Malawi, the normative significance of flatulence is considered from the respective standpoints of aesthetics, etiquette, and ethics, and it is indicated how aesthetics and etiquette may themselves also have ethical significance. It is concluded that etiquette and ethics may both require that certain violations of etiquette and ethics should sometimes be ignored.Item What Did Hecker Say about Laughter? Funny You Should Ask(The Israeli society for humor studies, 2020-01-01) Pfeifer, KarlThe Darwin-Hecker hypothesis, that laughter induced by tickling and humor share common underlying mechanisms, is so-called in part because of a quotation attributed to Ewald Hecker. However, a German counterpart of the quotation does not appear in the location cited. Some textual sleuthing is undertaken to find the real source.