Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirkland, K.J.
dc.contributor.authorBrandt, S.A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-22T19:20:03Z
dc.date.available2018-09-22T19:20:03Z
dc.date.issued1987-02-19
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10388/10889
dc.description.abstractA five-year field study was conducted at five locations in west central and north west Saskatchewan to determine the effect of cropping practices on weed populations in a continuous wheat rotation. Fall tillage, normal stubble height, tall stubble, and varying fertility levels (N and P) did not directly influence populations of grassy and broad-leaved weeds. In general, there was no significant differences between the herbicide combinations on grassy and broad-leaved weed populations at any of the five sites. Diclofop methyl (Hoegrass) applied as a tank mix with bromoxynil (Torch) or as a separate application with chlorsulfuron (Glean) or Bromoxynil/MCPA (Buctril M) and Triallate (Avadex BW) applied in the fall, followed by 2,4-D amine in the spring all reduced weed populations significantly. Yield increases from the application of Hoegrass plus Glean, Hoegrass/Torch, Hoegrass plus Buctril M and Avadex + 2,4-D were 21, 22, 19, and 15 % respectively.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSoils and Crops Workshop
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/*
dc.titleThe effect of management practices in a continuous wheat rotation on weed populationsen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.description.versionNon-Peer Reviewed


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada