University of SaskatchewanHARVEST
  • Login
  • Submit Your Work
  • About
    • About HARVEST
    • Guidelines
    • Browse
      • All of HARVEST
      • Communities & Collections
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
      • This Collection
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
    • My Account
      • Login
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
      View Item 
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item

      Challenging Scientific Hegemony: the Counter-Hegemony of Saskatoon Creationists

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      JEAN-DISSERTATION-2018.pdf (2.781Mb)
      Date
      2018-09-28
      Author
      Jean, Jason
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Level
      Doctoral
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      The Evolution-Creation controversy has existed ever since Charles Darwin first published On the Origin of Species in 1859. Over a century and a half later this controversy is still far from being resolved, either in North America or the rest of the world. One of the reasons for the longevity of this battle between these religious devotees and the scientific community over the legitimacy of biological evolution is the prevalence of misinformation, misleading historical narratives, inaccurate labels, and outright myths concerning the motivations, beliefs, and spread of religious opposition to the teaching of biological evolution. This research first seeks to identify and interpret the problematic misinformation which permeates the available literature on this controversy. Next, fresh insights are gained from the study of the often ignored regional and local creationist organizations and groups. Data from qualitative semi-structured interviews are utilized to understand both how and why creationist organizations and groups form, what beliefs they hold to, and what their goals are. The Evolution-Creation Controversy is interpreted and analysed utilizing a wide-variety of different theoretical perspectives such as: Antonio Gramsci’s hegemony, Stanley Cohn’s folk devil and moral panic, Thomas Gieryn’s public science and cultural cartography, as well as Pierre Bourdieu’s field, capital, and habitus. One of the main findings of this study is that antievolutionist creationist groups and organizations are not homogeneous, but often engage in infighting, with many factors that prevent them from collaborating with one another. The study also reveals that, even with respect to highly contested issues like the evolution-creation controversy, there can be desires and possibilities to create social space for more fruitful debate and discussion.
      Degree
      Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
      Department
      Sociology
      Program
      Sociology
      Supervisor
      Wotherspoon, Terry
      Committee
      Dickinson, Harley; Klaassen, Frank; Thompson, John; Poudrier, Jennifer
      Copyright Date
      August 2018
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10388/11217
      Subject
      hegemony
      folk devil
      moral panic
      cultural cartography
      field
      capital
      habitus
      Collections
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      University of Saskatchewan

      University Library

      The University of Saskatchewan's main campus is situated on Treaty 6 Territory and the Homeland of the Métis.

      © University of Saskatchewan
      Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy