University of SaskatchewanHARVEST
  • Login
  • Submit Your Work
  • About
    • About HARVEST
    • Guidelines
    • Browse
      • All of HARVEST
      • Communities & Collections
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
      • This Collection
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
    • My Account
      • Login
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
      View Item 
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item

      Humanitarian Intervention in Libya and Darfur: The Future of Responsibility to Protect

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      START-THESIS-2016.pdf (830.8Kb)
      Date
      2016-09-16
      Author
      Start, Jessica Margaret 1989-
      ORCID
      0000-0003-3679-5514
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Level
      Masters
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      Since the end of the Cold War and the disintegration of the global political hegemons, the world has seen an influx of deadly intrastate conflicts. The Responsibility to Protect doctrine emerged to address the global challenges raised by these civil wars, stating that humanitarian intervention is both necessary at times and a responsibility of the international community. The R2P doctrine was adopted in 2005, but the UN Security Council has struggled to consistently determine where, when, and how humanitarian interventions should be authorized to take place. The purpose of this research is to identify factors that influence UN Security Council decision making and determine the role of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine for current and future cases of humanitarian crisis. The methodology for this thesis is primarily a study of two select cases of intrastate conflict. The thesis will compare the UN's responses to the war in Darfur and the conflict in Libya. In addition to the case studies, the study of contemporary literature will help to explain the current state of humanitarian intervention and R2P. The results of the research show that humanitarian intervention is legal under the UN Charter, used and accepted by the international community, and a legitimate tool of the United Nations. There are many political and logistical complications surrounding the use of humanitarian intervention, and UN Security Council decision making in the cases of Darfur and Libya was influenced by terminology and language, national interests, host state consent, other military campaigns, and the anticipated cost. Even though the policy has been difficult to implement, the Responsibility to Protect doctrine has emerged as the only potentially useful international policy for preventing domestic conflicts from escalating and is now an integral part of humanitarian intervention. Further development and integration of the R2P doctrine, based on these results, could help to prevent future humanitarian crises.
      Degree
      Master of Arts (M.A.)
      Department
      Political Studies
      Program
      Political Science
      Supervisor
      Holroyd, Carin
      Committee
      Deonandan, Kalowatie; Michelmann, Hans; Labelle, Maurice; Hibbert, Neil
      Copyright Date
      October 2016
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10388/7430
      Subject
      Responsibility to Protect
      Humanitarian Intervention
      Collections
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      University of Saskatchewan

      University Library

      © University of Saskatchewan
      Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy