University of SaskatchewanHARVEST
  • Login
  • Submit Your Work
  • About
    • About HARVEST
    • Guidelines
    • Browse
      • All of HARVEST
      • Communities & Collections
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
      • This Collection
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
    • My Account
      • Login
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
      View Item 
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item

      DISTURBING PRAXIS: A FOUCAULDIAN ANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBJECTIVITIES AND CLASSROOM PEDAGOGIES IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      MCLEAN-DISSERTATION-2016.pdf (1.167Mb)
      Date
      2016-09-29
      Author
      McLean, Sheelah Rae
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Level
      Doctoral
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      This research combines self-study methodology with a Foucauldian analysis in order to investigate the relationship between nationalist discourses, teacher/student subjectivity, and the teaching and learning of integrative antiracism. Drawing from Michel Foucault’s theory of subjectivation this self-study examined student discourses of learning in relation to an integrative antiracist course I taught over a 6-year period in two schools located on the Canadian prairies. Using discourse analysis of 16 participant interviews, my research questions asked: How do students describe their experiences of learning in a course where spaces were created for a critical reading of the world? And what subject positions were made available s through their words? An important aspect of the study of discourse is an examination of how the self and/or others are constructed through accounts that are readily available. This research examined how students that occupy positions of dominance were instantiated and performed themselves as (even better) Canadian subjects through their management of discourse. This research shows how state discourses of nationalism, individualism, liberalism, and benevolence regulated the way that students and I performed social justice. Our negotiations of the “good teacher,” the “good student,” and the “good citizen” were performatively constituted through discursive frames of whiteness and heteronormativity. In particular, I will show how the students management of language was a form of self-surveillance that reified their position as dominant citizen-subjects. In constituting themselves as both innocent and superior, students embodied the discursive practices of the benevolent white settler state. This self-study allows me to analyze the everyday practices of subject formation and think about the power relations that are at play in a classroom setting.
      Degree
      Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
      Department
      Educational Foundations
      Program
      Educational Foundations
      Supervisor
      St. Denis, Verna; Wilson, Alexandria
      Committee
      Kovach, Margaret; Schick, Carol; Balzer, Geraldine
      Copyright Date
      August 2016
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10388/7509
      Subject
      Integrative antiracist education, public schools, white hetero-patriarchy
      Collections
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      University of Saskatchewan

      University Library

      The University of Saskatchewan's main campus is situated on Treaty 6 Territory and the Homeland of the Métis.

      © University of Saskatchewan
      Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy