Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeng, G.
dc.contributor.authorLahlali, R.
dc.contributor.authorPageau, D.
dc.contributor.authorHwang, S.F.
dc.contributor.authorHynes, R.K.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, K.
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, M.R.
dc.contributor.authorGossen, B.D.
dc.contributor.authorStrelkov, S.E.
dc.contributor.authorTurkington, K.T.
dc.contributor.authorFalk, K.
dc.contributor.authorYu, F.Q.
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, L.
dc.contributor.authorHupka, D.
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T17:36:05Z
dc.date.available2018-07-24T17:36:05Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-13
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10388/9100
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted to assess additional strategies potentially complimentary to cultivar resistance or biocontrol in control of clubroot. New granular Bacillus subtilis formulations and a seed dressing method were developed to facilitate biofungicide delivery in field trials. The granular formulations were applied in furrow during seeding at 50 kg/ha to a clubroot resistant (CR) and susceptible (CS) canola cultivar, respectively, in three field trials. The seed dressing applied approximately 1×105 to 5×106 cfu/seed doses of the biocontrol agent, and was evaluated on the CS cultivar seeded to different crop-rotation scenarios where the plots had a 1-year, 3-year, or 11-year break from last canola crop. Clubroot disease pressure was high at all trial sites with disease severity indexes (DSI) ranging from 69% to 98% on the CS cultivar. None of the granular formulations reduced clubroot substantially, whereas the CR cultivar showed a high effect, reducing DSI to below 15% and doubling the yield over that of CS cultivar. Plots of varying rotation showed a pattern of clubroot pathogen pressure, with those of 1-year break from canola being the highest. The DSI for all rotational scenarios was high, reaching 100% in short-rotation plots. Biofungicide seed dressing did not reduce DSI, but longer crop rotation often reduced gall size slightly, showed much milder above-ground damage, and increased the yield significantly relative to short rotation in two separate trials. Even a 3-year break from canola was highly beneficial, with the yield doubled as opposed to that with only 1-year break from canola.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSoils and Crops Workshop
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/*
dc.titleUse of cultivar resistance and crop rotation with Bacillus subtilis for clubroot control in canolaen_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
dc.description.versionNon-Peer Reviewed


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada