Economics of controlled urea fertilizer in cropping systems
Date
2009-02-26
Authors
Kulshreshtha, S.N.
Thomsen, J.
Grant, C.A.
Malhi, S.
Martin, T.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ORCID
Type
Presentation
Degree Level
Abstract
Nitrogen fertilizers are chemical compounds given to plants to promote growth. However, their
application can impact the environment through ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions, and
through leaching which can lead to deterioration of water quality. To understand the nitrogen
dynamics in the soil, a set of experiments were designed by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
(AAFC) research scientists with funding received from the Environmental Technology
Assessment for Agriculture (ETAA) and GAPS programs of AAFC, and Agrium, a fertilizer
company. Research trials were conducted to assess the impact of urea with comparison being
made between ESN (environmentally sensitive nitrogen) and uncoated urea. Trials were
conducted in five provinces and eight research sites. Harrow was the only eastern Canada site.
Experiments also included several fertilizer application rates, and at least two tillage systems –
conventional and reduced tillage. Zone tillage was also included at Harrow, Ontario. The general
conclusion from the foregoing set of data and analyses is that ESN application is a better
economic choice for certain crops in some regions, but not in all regions or for all crops. Even a
single crop was not found to generate a positive producer surplus in all regions. Reasons for
these differences need further investigation.
Description
Keywords
fertilizer use, environmentally sensitive urea
Citation
Degree
Department
Program
Advisor
Committee
Citation
Part Of
Soils and Crops Workshop