University of SaskatchewanHARVEST
  • Login
  • Submit Your Research
  • About
    • About HARVEST
    • Guidelines
    • Browse
      • All of HARVEST
      • Communities & Collections
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
      • This Collection
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
    • My Account
      • Login
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
      View Item 
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item

      Goaded, in the spirit of hierarchy : exigence, audience and the Maclean's university rankings

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      HUTCHINSON-THESIS.pdf (874.4Kb)
      Date
      2011-10-05
      Author
      Hutchinson, Janelle
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Level
      Masters
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      A rhetorical analysis, this thesis applies a neo-aristotelian framework to an examination of the speaker, audience and messages relationships encompassed within the Maclean’s University Rankings, a series of annual news reports which provide a ranking of Canadian universities based on a series of variables. As this analysis reveals, the Maclean’s University Rankings function ostensibly as a public discourse both informational and scientific in its statistical presentation, but beneath this gloss is a subtle promotion and reinforcement of a perception that universities are not properly accountable to the Canadian public and deserve to be publicly graded. The analysis dedicates a chapter to each of three rhetorical theories: Ernest Bormann’s Fantasy Theme Criticism, Daniel Boorstin’s Pseudo-event and Image construction and Lloyd Bitzer’s Rhetorical Situation in order to analyze the artefact from the speaker-audience, audience-message, and speaker-message relationships. The analysis then concludes that Maclean’s carefully highlights the financial risk of all choices involving university education (both with pursuing it and with not doing so) to keep readers fearful about the risks involved in specifically selecting a post-secondary institution and more generally about the state of Canadian university education. This fear serves a dual purpose: it offers Canadians an exigence to resolve, while simultaneously serving to strengthen Maclean’s ethos as a source of expertise on post-secondary education. Highlighting risk enables Maclean’s to persuade Canadians to accept the magazine as an expert authority in a highly specialized field, able to provide the general population with the clarity necessary to make informed decisions. Ultimately, this thesis interrogates the rankings’ reliance on audience perceptions of risk as a primary means of persuasion; the very act of soliciting trust in “expert opinion” reinforces certain divisive and value-laden hierarchies that underlie the rankings, allowing Maclean’s to extend its social and cultural authority beyond its traditional function as a source of information and opinion.
      Degree
      Master of Arts (M.A.)
      Department
      Interdisciplinary Studies
      Program
      Interdisciplinary Studies
      Supervisor
      Moffatt, John
      Committee
      Barber, Ernie; Phillips, Barbara; Maule, Charles; Keet, Michaela; Burgess, David
      Copyright Date
      September 2011
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2011-09-125
      Subject
      Maclean's
      Maclean's University Rankings
      Boorstin
      Bitzer
      Bormann
      Collections
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      University of Saskatchewan

      University Library

      © University of Saskatchewan
      Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy