University of SaskatchewanHARVEST
  • Login
  • Submit Your Work
  • About
    • About HARVEST
    • Guidelines
    • Browse
      • All of HARVEST
      • Communities & Collections
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
      • This Collection
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
    • My Account
      • Login
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
      View Item 
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item

      An evaluation of ecological stoichiometry in pelagic systems

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      VANDERGUCHT-THESIS.pdf (749.2Kb)
      Date
      2013-07-29
      Author
      Vandergucht, David
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Level
      Masters
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      Ecological stoichiometry is the study of the balance of chemical substances in ecosystems. In freshwaters, research has focused on how the ratios of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in organisms and their environment affect ecosystem processes. Because autotrophs have variable stoichiometry, particulate C:N:P ratios are used to assess nutrient availability in lakes. Zooplankton have relatively fixed stoichiometry and so differences between their body stoichiometry and the stoichiometry of their food can constrain their growth. Ecological stoichiometry predicts that zooplankton with low C:P body ratios (e.g., Daphnia) will be limited by the P content of their food in lakes where seston C:P is high. The stoichiometric theory of consumer-driven nutrient recycling (CNR) predicts that the stoichiometry of a consumer will influence the stoichiometry of the nutrients they regenerate through such processes as egestion and excretion. In lakes, zooplankton with a low body N:P are expected to regenerate nutrients in a high N:P ratio, potentially shifting nutrient limitation of the food web from N to P limitation. I used data from 99 Canadian lakes to test the following: a. Are particulate C:P and N:P ratios consistent with other P deficiency indicators? b. Do seston C:P and N:P ratios affect zooplankton community composition? c. Does zooplankton community composition affect plankton P limitation as predicted by CNR? Particulate C:P and N:P ratios generally agreed with other P deficiency indicators, except dissolved phosphate turnover times (TTPO4). C:P and N:P suggested P sufficiency more often than TTPO4, possibly because these two indicators respond to P deficiency over different time scales. Most zooplankton biomass parameters were negatively related to seston C:P ratios consistent with improved food quality at lower seston C:P. There was, however, no evidence that Daphnia were more strongly affected than any other zooplankton. Turnover times of particulate P in the whole plankton assemblage were not related to zooplankton community structure parameters. However, particulate P turnover in the >200 µm size fraction increased with increasing zooplankton biomass. There was no evidence for a particular effect of Daphnia on particulate P turnover. Phosphorus deficiency indicators showed a trend of relaxing P deficiency as zooplankton biomass and the proportion of Daphnia increased. This contradicts the predictions of CNR which suggest that Daphnia should cause greater P deficiency in lakes.
      Degree
      Master of Science (M.Sc.)
      Department
      Biology
      Program
      Biology
      Supervisor
      Hudson, Jeff
      Committee
      Evans, Marlene; Niyogi, Som; Davies, John-Mark
      Copyright Date
      June 2012
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2012-06-491
      Subject
      Ecological stoichiometry
      nutrients
      zooplankton
      lakes
      Collections
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      University of Saskatchewan

      University Library

      © University of Saskatchewan
      Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy