University of SaskatchewanHARVEST
  • Login
  • Submit Your Work
  • About
    • About HARVEST
    • Guidelines
    • Browse
      • All of HARVEST
      • Communities & Collections
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
      • This Collection
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
    • My Account
      • Login
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
      View Item 
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item

      The Case against Private Property in Carbon Assets: Why property rights in the carbon cycle are causing carbon policies to fail

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      SOUTER-THESIS.pdf (669.9Kb)
      Date
      2012-08-28
      Author
      Souter, Jennifer
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Level
      Masters
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      It is claimed that private property rights in carbon assets will both reduce carbon emissions and will increase investment in sequestration activities, thereby mitigating the effects of or solving climate change. Supposedly, property rights acting in a carbon market will assist emitters in transitioning to lower-emissions technology while creating an incentive for land managers to engage in rights-creating sequestration activities. This thesis focuses on biological sequestration and shows that property rights in carbon assets will hinder, rather than facilitate, carbon policy success. This thesis begins with an examination of whether it is appropriate to assign property rights to a natural cycle. Because of the physical, legal, and moral inability to exclude others from the carbon cycle, this thesis rejects private property rights in carbon assets, which represent a portion of the carbon cycle. However, as regulators desire to actively manage the carbon cycle, the common justifications of private property are reviewed to determine whether any of these property theories can justify the creation of private property in carbon assets. Private property rights in carbon assets are rejected as the rights, and the consequences of the rights, are contrary to society’s social, legal, administrative, and environmental goals. Ultimately, carbon policies are more likely to be successful when carbon assets are held publicly rather than privately. The conclusion of this thesis is significant as numerous governments have considered, or are considering, the creation of private property rights in carbon assets. Further, it is not evident that an academic analysis has previously been undertaken to determine whether creating property rights in the carbon cycle is appropriate or whether a property approach will reduce atmospheric carbon concentrations. The analysis in this thesis can play a role in creating successful and sustainable carbon policies.
      Degree
      Master of Laws (LL.M.)
      Department
      Law
      Program
      Law
      Supervisor
      Farnese, Patricia
      Committee
      Bowden, Marie-Ann; Phillipson, Martin
      Copyright Date
      June 2012
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2012-06-515
      Subject
      Property Rights
      Carbon Assets
      Collections
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      University of Saskatchewan

      University Library

      © University of Saskatchewan
      Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy