University of SaskatchewanHARVEST
  • Login
  • Submit Your Research
  • About
    • About HARVEST
    • Guidelines
    • Browse
      • All of HARVEST
      • Communities & Collections
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
      • This Collection
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
    • My Account
      • Login
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
      View Item 
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item

      Learning to recognize and generalize the sight of predators and non-predators : does turbidity impair recognition?

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      ALBATATI-THESIS.pdf (9.499Mb)
      Date
      2013-02-28
      Author
      AlBatati, Fawaz
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Level
      Masters
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      To be successful, individuals that are susceptible to predation have to optimize the trade-offs between predator avoidance and other fitness related activities such as foraging or reproduction. One challenge for prey is to identify which species pose a threat and should be avoided, and which species should be ignored. The goal of this study was to investigate whether minnows can generalize recognition of predators and non-predators using visual cues. I conducted experiments in both clear and turbid conditions to test whether the level of turbidity affects the quality of visual information available to the prey and hence the ability of prey to generalize. Latent inhibition and learned irrelevance are mechanisms of learning that can be used by prey to recognize stimuli as non-risky. Repeated exposure to an unknown stimulus in the absence of risk leads to the stimulus being categorized as non-risky. Fathead minnows were pre-exposed to the sight of brook trout or control water to provide minnows the opportunity to learn to recognize the trout as a non-predator. Following this the fish were conditioned with alarm cues (AC) to the sight of each predator paired and then their responses to the sight of brook trout, rainbow trout, and yellow perch were tested either in clear or turbid water. In clear water, minnows conditioned to recognize one of the trout species generalized their response to the other species. However, when the minnows were pre-exposed to the sight of a brook trout, they were inhibited from subsequently recognizing the sight of brook trout as threat and generalized this non-predator recognition to the sight of rainbow trout but not to yellow perch. In turbid water, however, minnows that were pre-exposed to the sight of brook trout had impaired responses to all predators while those pre-exposed to water showed an intermediate intensity anti-predator response toward each predator. Overall, my results demonstrate that minnows were able to distinguish between predators and non-predators in the clear environment but turbidity influences the visual information used by minnows and hence impaired the minnow’s ability to recognize and generalize the sight of predators and non-predator species.
      Degree
      Master of Science (M.Sc.)
      Department
      Biology
      Program
      Biology
      Supervisor
      Chivers, Douglas P.; Ferrari, Maud C.
      Committee
      Stookey, Joseph M.; Chilton, Neil B.
      Copyright Date
      February 2013
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10388/ETD-2013-02-921
      Subject
      Anthropogenic
      anti-predator behavior
      fathead minnows
      predator recognition
      risk assessment
      turbidity.
      Collections
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      University of Saskatchewan

      University Library

      © University of Saskatchewan
      Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy