Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorScharf, Murray P.en_US
dc.creatorSmall, Anthony Roberten_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-03T20:31:34Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-04T04:30:24Z
dc.date.available2005-05-05T08:00:00Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-01-04T04:30:24Z
dc.date.created2004-03en_US
dc.date.issued2004-03-17en_US
dc.date.submittedMarch 2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-05032004-203134en_US
dc.description.abstractThe argument presented here is that individual trust acts facilitate mutual exchange and are, therefore, the ground for the creation, elaboration and sustainability of organisations; specifically, democratic, educational organisations within Canada. The researcher assembles a composite definition of trust, which informs an analysis of themes found in the literature on both leadership and trust. The author argues three propositions based on trust to support the conclusion that trust determines follower receptivity to diverse leader behaviours. Proposition 1 is that, ‘trust and leadership require the free participation of agents. The degree to which agents perceive themselves as ‘free’ with respect to their interests is a measure of the utility of trust. Proposition 2 that, ‘trust and leadership are relational phenomena necessary for the creation and sustainability of organisations: trust is causative in this regard than is leadership. Proposition 3 is that, ‘the objects of trust and leadership may be concrete as in trust of another person or abstract as in trust in an institution (i.e., in a democracy). Trust is a paradox since the institutionalization of distrust is required for its function. This distrust takes the form of laws, sanctions, customs and norms. Trust is defined by the researcher as a particular item of experience or reality; specifically, the expectation that one will be treated justly in exchanges with others. To trust means to make oneself vulnerable for the purpose of entering into such exchanges, expressly or through an act of law.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectadministrationen_US
dc.subjectschoolsen_US
dc.subjectleadershipen_US
dc.subjecttrusten_US
dc.titleTrust relationships : an exposition of three propositionsen_US
thesis.degree.departmentEducational Administrationen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Administrationen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Saskatchewanen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Education (M.Ed.)en_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
dc.type.genreThesisen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWalker, Keith D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSackney, Lawrence (Larry)en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCarr-Stewart, Sheilaen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWickett, R. E. Y. (Reg)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record