Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStory, Donald C.en_US
dc.creatorMcLuckie, Sean Craigen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-26T08:26:19Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-04T04:33:21Z
dc.date.available2010-05-26T08:00:00Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-01-04T04:33:21Z
dc.date.created1998-05en_US
dc.date.issued1998-05en_US
dc.date.submittedMay 1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-05262009-082619en_US
dc.description.abstractTypically, students of foreign policy have viewed the decision-­making process from perspectives that downplay, if not ignore, societal influence. Canadian scholar Patrick Stuart Robinson has gone against this trend, asserting that foreign policy, properly understood, is in fact rooted in society. According to Robinson, the political process is inherently a social activity, and as such, imposes certain constraints on decision-makers. He asserts that decision-makers, like all members of society, have a role to play. Indeed, as the symbolic representatives of their constituency, these individuals have a particularly significant position within society -- they are at the helm of the ongoing process of affirming its values and rules. Like everyone else, they too are aware of, what is expected of them according to their role. However, because of their status, and because of the importance of what they do, decision-makers are especially burdened by societal expectations. Their choices cannot simply be made according to personal preferences; rather, they must be made against the backdrop of their leadership position and its attendant obligations to society. Importantly, as Robinson notes, the "political fortunes [of decision-makers] -- even their survival -- ­depend to a great extent on how they are popularly perceived to have discharged [their] ...responsibility." As a result, considerations of role and appropriateness are often pivotal to the policy-making process. This thesis, a case study of the Canadian response to the Cuban missile crisis, lends credence to Robinson's argument. Specifically, it shows that considerations of role, responsibility, and appropriateness were highly relevant to the Diefenbaker government in the formulation of Canadian policy. Moreover, this thesis dispels the popular notion that Canada's reaction to the crisis can be explained solely by reference to Prime Minister Diefenbaker's propensity for indecision, his personal antipathy for President Kennedy, or his strong Canadian nationalism.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleDiefenbaker, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the impact of society on foreign policyen_US
thesis.degree.departmentPolitical Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Saskatchewanen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts (M.A.)en_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
dc.type.genreThesisen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWheeler, Ronen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKordan, Bohdanen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDe Brou, Daveen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record