Pre-emption against terror : just war pacifist approach
Sem, Daniel Oduro
MetadataShow full item record
Having soberly reflected upon the tragedy of September 11, 2001, the author observed that though international law and treaties restrict pre-emptive war, they do allow for war in self-defense. Consequently, some powerful nations have used this as a justification for launching pre-emptive strikes. The threats posed by the powerful nations using self-defense as a justification for pre-emptive strikes and the inability of weaker nations to do the same, greatly account for the unprecedented explosion of global terrorism. The author thinks that confronting terrorism therefore requires a pro-pacifist ethical framework whose principles have to be applied with international law to narrow the legitimacy of self-defense wars. Hence, he proposes "Moral Consistency" as a required condition for launching pre-emptive strikes with two main aims - to reduce violent conflicts and to draw a substantial distinction between reason and justification, and between crime and criminal justice.
DegreeMaster of Arts (M.A.)
CommitteeO'Hagan, Emer; Howe, Leslie A.; Henderson, Toliver Y.; Selover, Thomas
Copyright DateAugust 2004
United Nations Charter