University of SaskatchewanHARVEST
  • Login
  • Submit Your Work
  • About
    • About HARVEST
    • Guidelines
    • Browse
      • All of HARVEST
      • Communities & Collections
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
      • This Collection
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
    • My Account
      • Login
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
      View Item 
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item

      Modelling the public intellectual : the case of Matthew Arnold

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      mcleod.pdf (436.3Kb)
      Date
      2007
      Author
      McLeod, Tenielle Robyn
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Level
      Masters
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      My thesis is titled “Modeling the Public Intellectual: The Case of Matthew Arnold.” Matthew Arnold, arguably “the most influential critic of his age” (Trilling 190) has also proven to be an influential model for the public intellectual currently in Canada and elsewhere. The role and work of public intellectuals is complex and who or what they are is the topic of vigorous debate and sometimes extreme disagreement. Because Arnold is so influential and controversial as a literary and social critic, I want to develop and to communicate a better understanding of his achievements and to explore the connection between his work and the role of the public intellectual. To that end, I draw on three of his works, “The Function of Criticism at the Present Time” (1864), Culture and Anarchy (1869) and Literature and Dogma (1873). In the course of a decade, Arnold asserts and expands the role of criticism in society and the kinds of issues a poet, critic, and inspector of schools feels competent to address while defining his own personal version of “the Victorian Sage” (Holloway). I also want to explore why criticism produced in the nineteenth century, particularly in Arnold’s work, promotes the figure and activities of the public intellectual. Moreover, I will reaffirm, via Arnold’s example, the importance of the relationship between literature and life and show how this connection nourishes the idea of the public intellectual in the English-speaking world.
      Degree
      Master of Arts (M.A.)
      Department
      English
      Program
      English
      Supervisor
      Findlay, Leonard M. (Len)
      Committee
      James-Cavan, Kathleen; Woodhouse, Howard
      Copyright Date
      2007
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-12202007-205105
      Subject
      Public Intellectual
      Culture
      Criticism
      Collections
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      University of Saskatchewan

      University Library

      © University of Saskatchewan
      Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy