Repository logo
 

Contested Loyalties: The British Occupations of Boston, Philadelphia, and Charleston

dc.contributor.advisorEnglebert, Robert
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCunfer, Jeff
dc.contributor.committeeMemberNeufeld, Matthew
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBell, Colleen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLabelle, Kathryn
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCarp, Benjamin
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKlaasen, Frank
dc.creatorLocke, Jason
dc.creator.orcid0009-0006-9600-1412
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-18T15:51:19Z
dc.date.available2024-11-18T15:51:19Z
dc.date.copyright2024
dc.date.created2024-12
dc.date.issued2024-11-18
dc.date.submittedDecember 2024
dc.date.updated2024-11-18T15:51:20Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract This dissertation examines the British military occupations of Boston, Philadelphia, and Charleston during the American Revolutionary War, revealing the complex interactions between the occupying forces and the local populations. By analyzing the unique sociocultural, economic, and political factors in each city, the study uncovers the diverse nature of loyalties and varying degrees of resistance to British authority, challenging the familiar textbook narrative of the Revolution. The research reveals the presence of three distinct American colonial identities that emerged from markedly different geohistorical and sociocultural environments in New England, the Middle colonies, and the South. These regional differences significantly influenced the reasons for each British military intervention, the course and nature of the occupations, and their outcomes. The study argues that the clash between the commercial interests of the Boston merchant elite and the financial interests of the British government led to the first occupation of Boston, while the second occupation resulted from the confronting class interests within the city itself. In contrast, the occupations of Philadelphia and Charleston were direct consequences of British political calculations and wartime strategies. The dissertation highlights the role of religious affiliation in predicting attitudes toward the occupying forces, with Calvinist denominations treating the British as allies or enemies based on the immediate impact on their economic status, Quakers and German Protestants leaning toward political neutrality, and Anglicans supporting the Crown or the plantocracy, depending on the local context. The study also examines the evolution of the British administrative model for governing occupied cities, from the initial failure in Boston due to the lack of civilian participation, to the successful military-civilian partnership in Philadelphia under Joseph Galloway, and finally, to the collapse of this model in Charleston due to mutual distrust and the British failure to understand Southern society. The research reveals that the British military presence served as an indicator of wider socioeconomic and political problems in the occupied societies. While the occupations unleashed a bourgeois revolution in New England and, to a lesser extent, in Philadelphia, the occupation of Charleston exposed the absence of such a revolution in the South, where the plantocracy maintained its feudal-like power. The dissertation concludes that the American Revolution and the American War of Independence were two distinct sociohistorical processes that overlapped in time but not in place, with the Revolution confined to the North and the War encompassing all thirteen colonies. The study challenges the notion of a unified American identity during and after the Revolution, highlighting the profound differences between the three regions and their respective paths to independence.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10388/16261
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectAmerican Revolution, loyalism, occupation, radicalism, collaboration, military hisory
dc.titleContested Loyalties: The British Occupations of Boston, Philadelphia, and Charleston
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentHistory
thesis.degree.disciplineHistory
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Saskatchewan
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LOCKE-DISSERTATION-2024.pdf
Size:
3.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
2.27 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: