Perspective on strategies for matching across age and sex in physiology research: “recreationally active” is not good enough
Date
2025-01-06
Authors
Schweitzer, Allyson M.
Fuller, Daniel
Fliss, Matthew D.
Mitchell, Cameron J.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
ORCID
Type
Article
Degree Level
Abstract
Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and muscular fitness are powerful confounders in age and sex-related comparisons. This paper provides a perspective on the benefits and limitations of matching participants by physical activity behaviour, objectively measured fitness and normative fitness percentiles. Data presented herein are a subset of a larger study, and highlight that matching by physical activity, does not necessarily match on other metrics like physical fitness, especially when age-related comparisons are being made. Our data showed that young and older adults matched by physical activity behaviours showed the expected higher CRF and muscular fitness in male and younger participants, but older adults had higher CRF percentiles. This suggests that matching by physical activity behaviour may select older adults with relatively higher CRF. Researchers must choose their matching method carefully to ensure the appropriate aspects of fitness have been matched between groups. For clarity, they should also report when certain aspects of fitness have not been accounted for and give an explanation as to why.
Description
© 2025 Schweitzer, Fuller, Fliss and Mitchell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Keywords
aging, exercise, matching, physical activity, self-report, sex comparisons
Citation
Schweitzer AM, Fuller D, Fliss MD and Mitchell CJ (2025) Perspective on strategies for matching across age and sex in physiology research: “recreationally active” is not good enough. Front. Physiol. 15:1517355. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1517355
Degree
Department
Program
Advisor
Committee
Part Of
item.page.relation.ispartofseries
DOI
10.3389/fphys.2024.1517355