Repository logo
 

Options for reducing ascochyta blight severity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

dc.contributor.advisorGan, Yantaien_US
dc.contributor.advisorWarkentin, Tom D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberShirtliffe, Steven J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCoulman, Bruce E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBanniza, Sabineen_US
dc.creatorChandirasekaran, Rajamohanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-06T19:42:26Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-04T04:36:21Z
dc.date.available2007-06-08T08:00:00Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-01-04T04:36:21Z
dc.date.created2007-06en_US
dc.date.issued2007-06-08en_US
dc.date.submittedJune 2007en_US
dc.description.abstractSuccessful chickpea production in western Canada typically requires multiple applications of fungicides to minimize the severity of Ascochyta blight (AB) caused by Ascochyta rabiei. Although planting resistant cultivars could be economical and environmentally safer than fungicide usage, varieties with a high level of resistance are not available. The objectives of this research were i) to determine the effect of different seeding arrangement treatments on ascochyta blight severity and seed yield of two cultivars (moderately resistant and susceptible) of kabuli chickpea; ii) to compare one and four fungicide applications at recommended and reduced rates and their impact on disease severity and cost; and iii) to assess organ-specific reaction to AB in chickpea in leaves, stems and pods of 12 desi and 12 kabuli varieties that are of economic significance to western Canada. Treatments significantly influenced AB severity on both moderately resistant and susceptible cultivars in a season with a severe epidemic. Seed yield was significantly influenced by treatments for both varieties in both years. Contrast analyses revealed that four fungicide applications significantly reduced the AB severity for both varieties in a season with a severe epidemic and for the susceptible variety in a season with a moderate epidemic. Seed yield of both varieties was significantly higher under four fungicide applications compared to a single application. Solid seeding and paired row arrangements did not differ in their effect on seed yield and AB severity for both varieties in both years, except that the susceptible variety benefited from paired row planting with respect to seed yield and reduced AB severity in the season with a severe epidemic. Reducing fungicide rates and seeding rate could reduce the cost of cultivation without significantly affecting disease control and yield. Economic assessment revealed that in a severe epidemic season, the gross returns were high for the moderately resistant variety under four fungicide applications than one fungicide application. Gross returns for the susceptible variety were higher under four fungicide applications in both years.There were differences among varieties for AB severity on leaves, stems and pods, seed yield and 1000 seed weight at all site-years tested. The variation was greater in kabuli varieties than desi varieties. AB severity on leaves, stems and pods was lower under high fungicide regimes, with few exceptions. Varieties with a fern leaf type had lower AB severity than those with unifoliate leaves. There was a positive correlation among AB severity on leaves, stems and pods. No differences in organ-specific reaction were observed.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-06062007-194226en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectchickpeaen_US
dc.subjectAscochyta blighten_US
dc.subjectalternative managementen_US
dc.subjectorgan-specific reactionen_US
dc.titleOptions for reducing ascochyta blight severity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)en_US
dc.type.genreThesisen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentPlant Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.disciplinePlant Sciencesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Saskatchewanen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
R.Chandirasekaran.CGSR.pdf
Size:
792.99 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
905 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description: