Keep our Doctors Committees in the Saskatchewan medicare controversy
| dc.contributor.committeeMember | Ward, Norman | en_US |
| dc.creator | Mohamed, Ahmed Mohiddin | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-05-14T10:00:35Z | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-04T04:30:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-05-20T08:00:00Z | en_US |
| dc.date.available | 2013-01-04T04:30:47Z | |
| dc.date.created | 1963-09 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 1963-09 | en_US |
| dc.date.submitted | September 1963 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The main task of the study has been to trace the development of the KODs - how, when, where and why did they come into being. Chapter II discussed the background to the Medicare controversy, the doctors' "unalterable" opposition to "State-Medicine", the College's efforts to educate the profession and the public on the matter and the Government's endeavours to meet what it considered the doctors' legitimate concerns. As the controversy developed, however, it soon became apparent that the real issues were those of differing social and political philosophies, of the concept of society and of the place of the individual and his relation to political authority. As neither the College nor the Government trusted the other, the issue became insoluble. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-05142009-100035 | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.title | Keep our Doctors Committees in the Saskatchewan medicare controversy | en_US |
| dc.type.genre | Thesis | en_US |
| dc.type.material | text | en_US |
| thesis.degree.department | Economics and Political Science | en_US |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Economics and Political Science | en_US |
| thesis.degree.grantor | University of Saskatchewan | en_US |
| thesis.degree.level | Masters | en_US |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Arts (M.A.) | en_US |