Repository logo
 

Comparative analysis of DIRAC PRO-VC-2, H.264 AVC and AVS CHINA-P7

dc.contributor.advisorDinh, Anhen_US
dc.contributor.advisorWahid, Khanen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKo, Seok-Bumen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKarki, Rajeshen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberVassileva, Julitaen_US
dc.creatorKalra, Visheshen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-28T14:04:43Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-04T04:41:05Z
dc.date.available2012-07-07T08:00:00Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-01-04T04:41:05Z
dc.date.created2011-06en_US
dc.date.issued2011-06en_US
dc.date.submittedJune 2011en_US
dc.description.abstractVideo codec compresses the input video source to reduce storage and transmission bandwidth requirements while maintaining the quality. It is an essential technology for applications, to name a few such as digital television, DVD-Video, mobile TV, videoconferencing and internet video streaming. There are different video codecs used in the industry today and understanding their operation to target certain video applications is the key to optimization. The latest advanced video codec standards have become of great importance in multimedia industries which provide cost-effective encoding and decoding of video and contribute for high compression and efficiency. Currently, H.264 AVC, AVS, and DIRAC are used in the industry to compress video. H.264 codec standard developed by the ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group (VCEG) together with the ISO/IEC Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG). Audio-video coding standard (AVS) is a working group of audio and video coding standard in China. VC-2, also known as Dirac Pro developed by BBC, is a royalty free technology that anyone can use and has been standardized through the SMPTE as VC-2. H.264 AVC, Dirac Pro, Dirac and AVS-P2 are dedicated to High Definition Video, while AVS-P7 is to mobile video. Out of many standards, this work performs a comparative analysis for the H.264 AVC, DIRAC PRO/SMPTE-VC-2 and AVS-P7 standards in low bitrate region and high bitrate region. Bitrate control and constant QP are the methods which are employed for analysis. Evaluation parameters like Compression Ratio, PSNR and SSIM are used for quality comparison. Depending on target application and available bitrate, order of performance is mentioned to show the preferred codec.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-06282011-140443en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSSIMen_US
dc.subjectPSNRen_US
dc.subjectH.264 AVCen_US
dc.subjectDIRAC PRO/VC-2en_US
dc.subjectAVS-P7en_US
dc.subjectCompression Ratioen_US
dc.subjectQPen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of DIRAC PRO-VC-2, H.264 AVC and AVS CHINA-P7en_US
dc.type.genreThesisen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentElectrical Engineeringen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineElectrical Engineeringen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Saskatchewanen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
COMPARATIVE_ANALYSIS_OF_DIRAC_PRO-VC-2_H.264_AVC_AND_AVS_CHINA-P7.pdf
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
905 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description: