ON THE BRINK: THEATRES SEARCH FOR A POST-PANDEMIC MODEL
dc.contributor.advisor | Fulton, Murray E | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Pohler, Dionne | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Lavalee, Jaime | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Reid , Wendy | |
dc.creator | Nolan, Yvette | |
dc.creator.orcid | 0009-0008-5939-0505 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-03T20:54:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-03T20:54:40Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2024 | |
dc.date.created | 2024-06 | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-10-03 | |
dc.date.submitted | June 2024 | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-10-03T20:54:41Z | |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis investigates the ways in which the leaders responsible for nonprofit theatres behave in moments of crisis, focusing on the response to the events of 2020: the COVID-19 pandemic and a social justice movement kicked into high gear by Black Lives Matter. Theatres had been struggling to change in the years leading up to the crisis, with a shrinking subscriber base, increasing competition with digital forms of entertainment, and diminishing relevance with younger and diverse audience members. In spite of an articulated desire to practice Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI), many theatres remained resolutely white on their stages, in their administrations and board rooms. My research examines the immediate response to the crises and the actions undertaken in the three subsequent years, based on semi-structured interviews with the leadership of fifteen theatres across Canada. Conducted three years after the beginning of the pandemic, the interviews gave the artistic directors, executive directors, and chairs of the boards the opportunity to reflect on policy and practice changes made and how they perceived their success. While every theatre responded to the turmoil of 2020 by undertaking actions to address inequity, lack of diversity, exclusion, health and wellness, and work-life balance, by the time of the interviews, other factors were affecting the success of those initiatives: audiences were not returning to theatres, the cost of living was increasing, public funding was decreasing, and the public’s attention was on global concerns like climate change and war. I contend, based on the data compiled, that a governance model that was already flawed proved incapable of meeting the challenges of a crisis that was essentially existential in nature. Boards of directors are most prepared to deal with financial crises, but the larger crisis of 2020 exposed and exacerbated the systemic problems that already existed. Further, a failure to address the systemic issues means that changes made during the pandemic are failing, or being abandoned. Finally, I argue that that the systemic problems of the model are jeopardizing the survival of theatres. | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10388/16137 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.subject | theatre | |
dc.subject | non-profit governance | |
dc.subject | ||
dc.title | ON THE BRINK: THEATRES SEARCH FOR A POST-PANDEMIC MODEL | |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.type.material | text | |
thesis.degree.department | Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy | |
thesis.degree.discipline | Public Policy | |
thesis.degree.grantor | University of Saskatchewan | |
thesis.degree.level | Masters | |
thesis.degree.name | Master of Public Policy (M.P.P.) |