Controlled Environment Comparison of Struvite Versus MAP on Growth and Recovery of Phosphorus in a Canola-Wheat-Pea Rotation
| dc.contributor.author | Shao, Mingxuan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fatteicher, Cory | |
| dc.contributor.author | Schoenau, Jeff | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mooleki, Patrick | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-26T22:25:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2020-03-26T22:25:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-03-10 | |
| dc.description.abstract | To meet the increasing demand for canola yield, prairie producers apply phosphorus (P) fertilizer to supply sufficient P for the current crop. However, the current maximum safe rate of seed-placed P for Saskatchewan are one configuration, which is 1-inch opener and 9-inch row spacing. There are evidences that greater opener spread can result in an increased maximum safe rate. The objective of this experiment is to evaluate how P fertilizer form (MAP vs Struvite), rate, and opener spread affects emergence, early biomass yield, and P uptake by canola, wheat and pea grown in rotational sequence in controlled environment conditions | en_US |
| dc.description.version | Non-Peer Reviewed | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10388/12744 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Soils and Crops Workshop | en_US |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada | * |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ | * |
| dc.subject | phosphorus | en_US |
| dc.subject | canola | en_US |
| dc.subject | struvite | en_US |
| dc.subject | Struvite vs MAP | en_US |
| dc.subject | canola-wheat-pea rotation | en_US |
| dc.title | Controlled Environment Comparison of Struvite Versus MAP on Growth and Recovery of Phosphorus in a Canola-Wheat-Pea Rotation | en_US |
| dc.type | Poster Presentation | en_US |