University of SaskatchewanHARVEST
  • Login
  • Submit Your Work
  • About
    • About HARVEST
    • Guidelines
    • Browse
      • All of HARVEST
      • Communities & Collections
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
      • This Collection
      • By Issue Date
      • Authors
      • Titles
      • Subjects
    • My Account
      • Login
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
      View Item 
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item
      • HARVEST
      • Electronic Theses and Dissertations
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      • View Item

      ADHD and Reasoning Performance: Bridging the Gap between Science and the Classroom

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      GIBB-THESIS-2016.pdf (1.556Mb)
      Date
      2016-09-21
      Author
      Gibb, Maia K.G. 1962-
      Type
      Thesis
      Degree Level
      Masters
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      Decision errors occur because faster, Type 1 processes supply an autonomous dominant response founded on beliefs that can be difficult to inhibit and override by slower Type 2 processes correlated with more rational thinking. ADHD is widely associated with primary deficits in inhibitory control (Barkley, 1997), a central executive mechanism that plays a principal role in analytic thinking. Differences in reasoning abilities between university students with ADHD (n = 64) and without (n = 64) were measured by asking both groups to solve 24 base-rate problems (12 conflict, 12 non-conflict) that included a response instruction manipulation of answering either with “beliefs” or “statistics.” Participants also completed the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT), a three-item problem-solving task that cues an intuitive, yet erroneous, response that must be inhibited and overruled to provide a correct answer. Surprisingly, accuracy rates for ADHD participants on the CRT task matched that of controls. Similarly, ADHD participants performed equal to or better than controls on base-rate problems thought to require inhibitory control. The pattern of response times for both study tasks suggests that the acknowledged inhibitory deficits in ADHD may manifest themselves in response latencies. Thus, despite similar or better accuracy rates, ADHD reasoners required extended time to overcome inhibitory deficits. A further finding was that on base-rate problems solved with beliefs, on conflict and non-conflict problems, the ADHD group required significantly longer to encode the lengthy personality descriptions. Likely this is due to inefficient working memory systems, strongly associated with ADHD, that hamper the ability to temporarily store and manipulate information (Holmes et al., 2014). Altogether, these findings have implications for classroom instruction for students with ADHD and may assist with developing effective pedagogies to provide a positive and rewarding learning experience for students with diverse learning needs.
      Degree
      Master of Education (M.Ed.)
      Department
      Educational Psychology and Special Education
      Program
      Educational Psychology and Special Education
      Supervisor
      Hellsten, Laurie-Ann
      Committee
      McIntyre, Laureen; Claypool, Timothy; Thompson, Valerie; Montgomery, Janine
      Copyright Date
      August 2016
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10388/7454
      Subject
      ADHD
      reasoning
      executive inhibition
      response delay
      disinhibition theories
      dual process theories of reasoning
      inhibitory control
      Collections
      • Graduate Theses and Dissertations
      University of Saskatchewan

      University Library

      © University of Saskatchewan
      Contact Us | Disclaimer | Privacy