The marriage dialogue
| dc.contributor.advisor | Poelzer, Greg | en_US |
| dc.contributor.committeeMember | McGrane, David | en_US |
| dc.contributor.committeeMember | Michelmann, Hans | en_US |
| dc.creator | Moore, James Arthur | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-04-15T14:02:32Z | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-04T04:29:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-04-18T08:00:00Z | en_US |
| dc.date.available | 2013-01-04T04:29:24Z | |
| dc.date.created | 2011-04 | en_US |
| dc.date.issued | 2011-04 | en_US |
| dc.date.submitted | April 2011 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Using the contemporary example of same-sex marriage, the author uses his first-hand experience as a Member of Parliament to examine the "dialogue" theory of Charter of Rights and Freedoms politics and decision-making role of legislators. The dialogue between courts, legislatures and Canadians is robust and having a significant impact on public policy in Canada. However, many of those in the legislature are either unaware or uninterested in this changing fact of Canadian policy making. This is particularly troubling given the power MPs have when voting in the House of Commons on an issue of equality rights in the House of Commons in a free vote - as was the case in the issue at the centre of this thesis, the issue of same-sex marriage. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-04152011-140232 | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.subject | marriage | en_US |
| dc.subject | Charter of Rights | en_US |
| dc.subject | equality | en_US |
| dc.subject | same-sex marriage | en_US |
| dc.title | The marriage dialogue | en_US |
| dc.type.genre | Thesis | en_US |
| dc.type.material | text | en_US |
| thesis.degree.department | Political Studies | en_US |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Political Studies | en_US |
| thesis.degree.grantor | University of Saskatchewan | en_US |
| thesis.degree.level | Masters | en_US |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Arts (M.A.) | en_US |