Repository logo
 

Social factors that affect the behaviour and productivity of gestating sows in an electronic sow feeding system

dc.contributor.advisorGonyou, Harold W.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberThacker, Philip A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStookey, Joseph M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberConnor, M. L. (Laurie)en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBuchanan, Fiona C.en_US
dc.creatorStrawford, Megan Leahen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-03-06T13:24:05Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-04T04:26:18Z
dc.date.available2007-03-07T08:00:00Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-01-04T04:26:18Z
dc.date.created2006-02en_US
dc.date.issued2006-02-16en_US
dc.date.submittedFebruary 2006en_US
dc.description.abstractPrevious research has shown that the productivity of sows housed in an Electronic Sow Feeding (ESF) system is affected by the housing management (static vs. dynamic), stage of gestation at mixing and parity. Familiarity has also been shown to affect the behaviour of group-housed sows. Thus, the objective of this experiment was to determine how the previously mentioned social factors affect the behaviour, physiology and productivity of sows housed in an ESF system. Sows were regrouped into either the static and dynamic pens. Within an introduction group, a subgroup of up to 24 focals sows was observed. The focal sows were chosen based on whether they were mixed pre vs. post-implantation (46 days post-breeding), familiar vs. unfamiliar with group mates and parity (1st vs. 2nd and 3rd vs. 4th +). Aggression at mixing and at the feeder, injury scores, feeder entry order, space usage, salivary cortisol and farrowing productivity was recorded. The data was analyzed using Proc-Mixed and the General Model for SAS. Housing did not have a significant effect on the any of the parameters examined. Young sows had significantly more piglets born alive when housed in a dynamic system, while old sows had more piglets born alive when housed in a static system (p=0.03). Pre-implant sows initiated more aggressive encounters than post-implant sows (p=0.01). Post-implant sows ate later in the feeding cycle (p=0.03), rested on the slats more (pen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-03062006-132405en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectstaticen_US
dc.subjectparityen_US
dc.subjectfamiliarityen_US
dc.subjectstage of gestationen_US
dc.subjectdynamicen_US
dc.titleSocial factors that affect the behaviour and productivity of gestating sows in an electronic sow feeding systemen_US
dc.type.genreThesisen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentAnimal and Poultry Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineAnimal and Poultry Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Saskatchewanen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Thesis.pdf
Size:
357.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
905 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description: