Repository logo
 

Exploring the Culture of Decanal Search Processes: A Search for Excellence

dc.contributor.advisorWalker, Keith
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBarber, Ernie
dc.contributor.committeeMemberXiao, Jing
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLondon, Chad
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCottrell, Michael
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKroll, Ed
dc.creatorMcInnes, Kelly
dc.creator.orcid0000-0003-4004-0499
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T16:13:07Z
dc.date.available2022-03-07T16:13:07Z
dc.date.created2022-06
dc.date.issued2022-03-02
dc.date.submittedJune 2022
dc.date.updated2022-03-07T16:13:07Z
dc.description.abstractAcademic deans are uniquely positioned in universities and play an important role in their organizations (Twombly, 1992; Wolverton & Gmelch, 2002). Despite the importance placed on this role, there has been little attention paid to the processes by which academic deans are identified and recruited (Twombly, 1992).The purpose of this study was to explore the culture of decanal search processes in one traditional research university. This exploration considered the views of a number of organizational culture scholars that included Schein (1985, 1992, 2004), Trice and Beyer (1993) and Hallett (2003). These views coalesced in a conceptual framework of organizational culture created by Allaire and Firsirotu (1984). This research was conducted within a qualitative paradigm (Creswell, 2007; Klenke, 2016) underpinned by philosophical assumptions that situated me in an interpretive paradigm (Burrell & Morgan, 1979). The processes of research included case study (Yin, 2003) and constructionist grounded theory (Charmaz, 2009). The primary source of data consisted of interviews and focus groups with individuals who participated in a decanal search between 2014 and 2017 (inclusive) either as a member of, or as a consultant to, the search committee. Findings from the data revealed that research participants described their experiences as frustrating and overwhelmingly negative. Individually, research participants understood decanal search processes from the lens of their own experiences with other search and/or collegial processes and there was scant evidence to suggest any collective understanding of search processes. What was revealed was that research participants expected decanal search processes to be something different than they were. Constructive and critical insight gained from research participants resulted in several suggestions for refining decanal search processes. Through consideration of the Allaire and Firsirotu (1984) framework what started as an exploration of culture in decanal search processes turned out to be an exploration of decanal search processes in organizational culture. This resulted in an exploration of the interrelated components of organizational culture and the extent to which they are mutually supportive and harmonious, or not. Implications for practice, theory and research reflected refinements to decanal search processes, positioning culture as an object of study more broadly, and focusing more scholarly attention on decanal search, and other related, processes.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10388/13839
dc.subjectAcademic deans
dc.subjectdeans
dc.subjectuniversity
dc.subjecthigher education
dc.subjectsearch processes
dc.subjectrecruitment
dc.subjectorganizational culture
dc.subjectculture
dc.titleExploring the Culture of Decanal Search Processes: A Search for Excellence
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.materialtext
thesis.degree.departmentEducational Administration
thesis.degree.disciplineEducational Administration
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Saskatchewan
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MCINNES-DISSERTATION-2022.pdf
Size:
1.9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
LICENSE.txt
Size:
2.27 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: