Repository logo
 

The effects of housing grow-finish pigs in two different group sizes and floor space allocations

dc.contributor.advisorGonyou, Harold W.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWillson, Philipen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberThacker, Philip A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStookey, Joseph M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBuchanan, Fiona C.en_US
dc.creatorStreet, Brandy Roseen_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-11-24T09:47:16Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-04T05:09:05Z
dc.date.available2006-11-24T08:00:00Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-01-04T05:09:05Z
dc.date.created2005-11en_US
dc.date.issued2005-11-14en_US
dc.date.submittedNovember 2005en_US
dc.description.abstractCrowding of grow-finish pigs reduces growth and is considered a welfare issue. Most crowding studies have been limited to smaller group sizes than are currently being considered in the swine industry. It has been hypothesized that pigs in large groups require less space to maintain growth and welfare. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of group size and space allowance on the performance, health and welfare of grow-finish pigs. The study consisted of eight blocks, each with four experimental units in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of group size (18 vs. 108 pigs/pen) and space allowance (0.52 vs. 0.78 m2/pig). Health assessments were conducted daily; production data were collected weekly; injury scores, behaviour and salivary cortisol data were collected bi-weekly; and carcass and adrenal gland data were collected at slaughter. Gains were lower for crowded pigs, but the effects were limited to the final week of the study. Pigs in crowded groups had a lower feed efficiency, which followed a trend similar to that of gains over time. In the crowded groups, pigs spent less time at the feeder, but no other variables differed among space allowances. Gains were lower for pigs housed in large groups, but the effects were limited to the initial two weeks of the study. Pigs in large groups had a lower feed efficiency and more lameness and leg sores. Other health measures did not differ between the group sizes. Lying behaviour of pigs in large groups indicated that they were able to utilize free space more efficiently than pigs housed in small groups. Analysis of feeding patterns suggests that pigs housed in large crowded groups were able to manoeuvre around their environment more easily than those in small crowded groups, yet performance of pigs in large groups was similarly affected by space restriction as pigs in small groups. Interactions of group size and space allowance indicated that pigs in large crowded groups were more susceptible to lameness. There was no indication that pigs in large groups required less space, or could perform as well at reduced space allowances, than pigs in small groups.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-11242005-094716en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectpigsen_US
dc.subjectgroup sizeen_US
dc.subjectspace allowanceen_US
dc.subjectbehaviouren_US
dc.subjectproductivityen_US
dc.subjecthealthen_US
dc.subjectwelfareen_US
dc.titleThe effects of housing grow-finish pigs in two different group sizes and floor space allocationsen_US
dc.type.genreThesisen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentAnimal and Poultry Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineAnimal and Poultry Scienceen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Saskatchewanen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.Sc.)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis.pdf
Size:
1.17 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
905 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description: