Repository logo
 

Institutional requirements for watershed cumulative effects assessment in the south Saskatchewan watershed

dc.contributor.advisorNoble, Bramen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberPatrick, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBruneau, Joelen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBelcher, Kennethen_US
dc.creatorSheelanere, Poornimaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-29T09:03:23Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-04T04:41:22Z
dc.date.available2011-06-29T08:00:00Zen_US
dc.date.available2013-01-04T04:41:22Z
dc.date.created2010-06en_US
dc.date.issued2010-06en_US
dc.date.submittedJune 2010en_US
dc.description.abstractWatersheds in Canada are under increasing threats due to the cumulative environmental effects from natural and anthropogenic sources. Cumulative effect assessment (CEA), however, if done at all is typically done on a project-by-project basis. This project-based approach to CEA is not sufficient to address the cumulative effects of multiple stressors in a watershed or a region. As a result, there is now a general consensus that CEA must extend from the project to the more regional scale. The problem, however, is that while the science of how to do watershed CEA (W-CEA) is progressing, the appropriate institutional arrangements to sustain W-CEA have not been addressed. Based on a case study of the South Saskatchewan Watershed (SSW), this research is aimed to identify the institutional requirements necessary to support and sustain W-CEA. The research methods include document reviews and semi-structured interviews with regulators, administrators, watershed coordinators, practitioners, and academics knowledgeable on cumulative effect assessment and project-based environmental assessments (EAs). The findings from this research are presented thematically. First, participants’ perspectives on cumulative effects, the current state of CEA practice, and general challenges to project-based approaches to CEA are presented. The concept of WCEA is then examined, with a discussion on the need for linking project-based CEA and W-CEA. This is followed by the institutional requirements for W-CEA. The Chapter concludes with foreseeable challenges to implementing W-CEA, as identified by research participants. The key findings include that cumulative effect assessments under project-based EAs are rarely undertaken in the SSW, and the project-based EA approach is faced with considerable challenges. The project-based EA challenges suggested by interview participants are similar to the ones discussed in the literature, and are primarily related to the lack of guidance to proponents regarding boundaries of assessments and thresholds, the lack of data from other project EAs, and the lack of capacity of both proponents and regulators to achieve a good CEA under project EA. These challenges could be addressed by establishing regional objectives at a broader scale, which could provide better context to project-based approaches. Further, interview results revealed several opportunities for the government to take the lead in implementing and sustaining W-CEA, but a multistakeholder approach is essential to W-CEA success. The results also suggest that the establishments of thresholds and data management are necessary components of W-CEA, but that the need for legislation concerning such thresholds and W-CEA initiatives is not agreed upon. At the same time, research results emphasize that the coordination and education among various stakeholders will be difficult to achieve. The lack of financial commitment, political will, and difficulties in establishing cause-effect relationships currently impede the implementation of W-CEA.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10388/etd-06292010-090323en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSouth Saskatchewan watersheden_US
dc.subjectCumulative effectsen_US
dc.subjectCumulative effects assessmenten_US
dc.subjectInstitutional arrangementsen_US
dc.subjectProject-based assessmentsen_US
dc.titleInstitutional requirements for watershed cumulative effects assessment in the south Saskatchewan watersheden_US
dc.type.genreThesisen_US
dc.type.materialtexten_US
thesis.degree.departmentSchool of Environment and Sustainabilityen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineSchool of Environment and Sustainabilityen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Saskatchewanen_US
thesis.degree.levelMastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Environment and Sustainability (M.E.S.)en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SHEELANERE_P_THESIS.pdf
Size:
5.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
905 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description: